ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2025
Multi-Objective Optimization of Dental Implant Designs With Multi-Recessed Holes: Insights From Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of Design-Phase Digital Twin for Structural Optimization of a Biomedical Device.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Advanced Mathematical Methods in Dental Bioengineering and Biomaterials Machining.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multi-Objective Optimization of Dental Implant Designs With Multi-Recessed Holes: Insights From Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a novel dental implant design featuring multi-recessed holes, developed through an integrated multi-objective optimization framework. The impact of the implant geometry on longevity, strength, and success rate is explored under both static and dynamic loading conditions. The novel design features multi-recessed holes, and five key implant parameters are selected as control factors for optimization. Experimental simulations are conducted using the uniform design (UD) method. Finite element analysis (FEA) is used to simulate the implant system to evaluate the fatigue safety factor and equivalent stress at the primary, middle, and final stages of osseointegration. Additionally, the dynamic FEA is employed to calculate the maximum micromotion under dynamic chewing loads. To maximize the fatigue safety factor and minimize equivalent stress and micromotion, a multi-objective optimization approach is applied, integrating Kriging interpolation (KGI), entropy weighting analysis (EWA), the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), and genetic algorithms (GA). The optimal design achieves a fatigue safety factor of 3.022 and an equivalent stress of 459.49 MPa, with improvements of 28.1% and 3.2%, respectively, compared to the original design. Furthermore, the optimized design results in a micromotion of 32.96 μm, reflecting a 37.1% improvement. Overall, the multi-objective optimization process enhances the implant's safety factor and strength under various loading conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.