ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2025
[Determination of eight per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in seawater using dispersive membrane extraction-ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are widely utilized in various industrial applications. Their persistence in ecosystems raises significant global environmental health concerns. Numerous studies have confirmed the toxicity of PFASs to human endocrine and immune systems. The carcinogenic risks associated with PFASs exposure increasingly alarm public health authorities worldwide. As a result, regulatory policies have been implemented to restrict both the production and environmental release of PFASs. In China, the GB 5749-2022 standard establishes stringent limits for PFASs concentrations in drinking water, capping levels of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) at 40 ng/L and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) at 80 ng/L. Effective monitoring of PFASs requires advanced analytical techniques that exhibit exceptional sensitivity. Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) has emerged as the preferred technique for detecting these substances due to its superior selectivity and low detection limits. However, complex environmental matrices necessitate optimized sample pretreatment strategies to enhance analysis accuracy. Efficient extraction methods must effectively address matrix interference while ensuring analyte enrichment. Dispersive membrane extraction (DME) presents distinct advantages for the pretreatment of PFASs; its operational simplicity is complemented by high enrichment capabilities and efficient mass transfer. The selection of extraction materials critically influences DME performance parameters. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous materials composed of organic ligands and metal clusters, featuring tunable pores, high surface areas, and rapid mass transfer. These unique properties enable their current use in sample pretreatment for environmental analysis. This study integrates DME with UHPLC-MS/MS utilizing cationic MOF membranes, enabling simultaneous detection of eight different PFASs within seawater matrices. Optimized parameters ensure reliable quantification of trace-level contaminants throughout this process. The experimental design assessed various parameters, including types of organic solvents (methanol and acetonitrile), ammonium acetate concentrations in the aqueous phase (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 mmol/L), as well as ion source voltages (-2 500, -3 500, and -4 500 V), all of which influenced detection efficacy. Chromatographic separation was performed using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (100 mm×2.1 mm, 1.7 μm). Gradient elution combined 1 mmol/L ammonium acetate with acetonitrile for optimal results. Detection was conducted utilizing electrospray ionization (ESI) in negative ion scanning mode coupled with multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The results indicated that all eight PFASs could be effectively separated within a timeframe of 12 min, exhibiting favorable peak shapes and high response values. Under optimal conditions, the eight PFASs demonstrated strong linearity across their respective concentration ranges; the correlation coefficients (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.