Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200771›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

Understanding Preferences for Weight Loss Diets Amongst Patients With a Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.

Alexis Carey, Rachel Povey, Sarah Higgins, Richard Cooke, David Clark-Carter, Basil Issa, Michelle Harvie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Understanding Preferences for Weight Loss Diets Amongst Patients With a Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexis CareyDepartment of Psychology, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, England.ORCID 0000-0002-6663-567X
Rachel PoveyDepartment of Psychology, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, England.ORCID 0000-0003-2092-7498
Sarah HigginsDepartment of Psychology, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, England.ORCID 0000-0002-8474-9566
Richard CookeDepartment of Psychology, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, England.
David Clark-CarterDepartment of Psychology, University of Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, England.
Basil IssaManchester University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, England.
Michelle HarvieManchester University Hospital Foundation NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, England.ORCID 0000-0001-9761-3089

Funding

The study was funded by the endocrinology and diabetes research fund, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation trust.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWeight control is a cornerstone of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) management. The low-calorie diet program continuous low energy diets (CLED) is currently offered to patients for remission in the United Kingdom, but this may not suit all patients. Intermittent Low Energy Diets (ILED) may be an alternative approach. This survey explored patient characteristics and dietary choice priorities to predict preference for CLED, ILED, and other diets to inform future patient-centered advice.

methods622 participants (> 18 years) with a diagnosis of T2D recruited via a patient volunteer database, social media and the Prolific research register completed an online survey. Demographics, health characteristics, T2D treatment factors and dietary choice priorities were analyzed to predict preference between CLED and ILED. In addition, we explored qualitative reasons why participants were choosing between these two diets as well as other calorie-restricted diets.

resultsCLED preference was significantly higher among all the < 65 age groups (than those aged > 74), and those who prioritized reduced medicine dependency (1.75 times more likely) and prioritizing speed of weight loss (2.59 times more likely) over improving blood sugar. ILED preference was associated with prioritizing flexibility of food choice (2.73 times more likely) and prioritizing diets which fit in with family meals and social events (2.5 times as likely) over professional support. Content analysis showed that CLED and ILED diets weren't the most popular dietary choice, with more patients expressing preferences for a daily food based moderate calorie-restricted diet and low carbohydrate diets. Simplicity to follow was a common theme across all diets, demonstrating the importance of ensuring that any prescribed diet has clear and easy instructions.

conclusionPatients' dietary preferences are influenced by a range of factors including the outcome and the extent to which the diet will fit into their lifestyles. Understanding patient perspectives about desired dietary outcomes and how they envisage the diet fitting into their lives will enable professionals to provide helpful patient-centered advice which may increase the likelihood of adherence.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diet, ReducingPatient PreferenceAdultAgedChoice BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomWeight Lossattitudes and behaviordiabetesdietary influencesdietary interventiondisease/therapeutic areasfood intake

Identifiers

PMID41200771
PMCPMC12593182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.