ArticleSA journal of radiology2025
AI-enabled POCUS for breast cancer risk stratification in a resource-limited tertiary clinic.
Article in SA journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer remains a major public health burden in South Africa, with diagnostic delays contributing to poor outcomes. Ultrasound is effective for early detection but is limited by access and operator variability. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) offers a potential solution. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a locally developed AI-enabled POCUS system (Breast AI) in predicting malignancy among women with palpable breast abnormalities. Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted between June 2024 and November 2024 at Groote Schuur Hospital. Women aged ≥ 25 years with suspicious breast lesions underwent Breast AI ultrasound prior to biopsy. Real-time malignancy risk scores were compared with histopathological results. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), F1 score and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Among 159 participants, Breast AI achieved a sensitivity of 67.2%, specificity of 79.4% and PPV of 70.3% at a 51% threshold. The AUC was 0.76, reflecting moderate discriminatory performance. F1 score analysis identified 51% as the optimal cut-off (F1 = 65.7%). Benign pathologies such as fibroadenomas and fat necrosis correlated with low AI scores. A three-tiered risk model was developed: < 30% (low), 30% - 51% (intermediate) and > 51% (high risk). Conclusion: Breast AI demonstrates promising diagnostic accuracy for triaging suspicious breast lesions, particularly in resource-constrained settings. Contribution: This study provides real-world evidence supporting the integration of AI into POCUS to improve breast cancer detection and clinical decision-making in low-resource environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.