ArticleSA journal of radiology2025
An analysis of interventional radiology training needs of radiology registrars in South Africa.
Article in SA journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interventional radiology (IR) is rapidly growing as a critical subspeciality, yet in South Africa (SA) IR training remains underdeveloped, with no national data to guide structured training and workforce expansion. Objectives: This study aimed to assess South African radiology registrars' interest in IR, their exposure, and the existing training environment. Method: A cross-sectional, electronic quantitative and qualitative survey was conducted from 09 February 2024 to 08 March 2024 among registrars affiliated with the Radiological Society of South Africa. The survey gauged their interest in IR, exposure, training infrastructure, learning tools, satisfaction with training and potential areas for improvement. Results: Response rate: 45% (100/221 registrars); 54% were female, median age was 33.4 years and 51% in their first or second year. Interest in IR as a subspeciality was expressed by 40%, 27% were not interested and 33% were unsure. Only 27% reported adequate exposure; 56% had limited exposure and 17% had none. Dissatisfaction with IR training was noticed by 47%, 37% were undecided and 16% were satisfied. Only 9% had a structured curriculum, while 23% relied on mentorship. Major themes for improvement included structured training, mentorship, supervision, training facilities and hands-on exposure. Conclusion: Despite strong interest, radiology registrars (including international supernumerary registrars) face significant gaps in IR training and exposure in SA. Contribution: This is the first national study to provide essential baseline data to inform targeted reforms and development of structured, locally relevant IR training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.