ReviewJournal of caring sciences2025
Multi Components in the Implementation of Advanced Care Planning for Patients with Cancer: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Advance care planning (ACP) facilitates patients' preferences for future treatment. It has been associated with improved quality of end-of-life care. While several factors contribute to ACP implementation, little is known about the specific components involved. This scoping review aimed to identify and explore components of ACP, including knowledge, attitudes, values and beliefs, cultural and ethnic factors in patients with cancer and their families. Methods: The scoping review followed the updated Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) 2020 checklist. A search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct databases until December 2023, and the selected articles were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Critical Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: This scoping review included 42 studies. The included studies were grouped by design: quantitative (n=12), qualitative (n=15), and mixed methods (n=15). Key ACP components identified included knowledge and perceptions (n=28), attitudes and behaviours (n=33), values and beliefs (n=26), and cultural and ethnic aspects (n=13). Conclusion: This review provides a summary of the crucial components including knowledge and perception, attitudes and behaviors, values and beliefs, and cultural and ethnic perspectives to consider when implementing ACP for patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.