ArticleCureus2025
The Significance of Emergency Surgical Operations for Severe Elderly Patients Considering Medical Costs and Activities of Daily Life.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The global population is aging rapidly, and physicians increasingly face challenges in determining the appropriateness of emergency surgery for elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of emergency operations in elderly patients. Methods This retrospective clinical study included patients transferred to the emergency department of Gunma University Hospital and admitted to the intensive care unit following emergency surgery between January 2013 and December 2019. Patients were categorized into three age groups: 18-64 years (Group Y), 65-84 years (Group M), and ≥85 years (Group E). Clinical courses, including activities of daily living (ADL), were compared across groups. The primary outcomes were hospital mortality and the proportion of patients discharged directly home; secondary outcomes included additional clinical characteristics. Results A total of 84 patients were included: 30 in Group Y, 42 in Group M, and 12 in Group E. Both preoperative and postoperative ADL scores were significantly lower in Group E. Medical costs did not differ significantly among the groups. Although hospital mortality was highest in Group E, the difference was not statistically significant. However, the proportion of patients discharged directly home was significantly lower in Group E. Conclusions Emergency operations in patients aged ≥85 years may achieve outcomes comparable to those in younger patients; however, the total treatment period is likely to be prolonged due to significantly reduced postoperative ADL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.