ArticleCureus2025
Differential Diagnosis in Patients Presenting With Peripheral Lymphadenopathy: Tuberculosis, Sarcoidosis, or Malignancy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differential diagnosis of peripheral lymphadenopathies is important in terms of not missing infections or non-infectious diseases and early diagnosis of malignancies. Preliminary diagnoses of tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, and malignancy were considered for two clinically similar patients, a 33-year-old man and a 41-year-old woman, who presented to our clinic with neck swelling. The male patient's exposure to tuberculosis and the chest x-ray brought us closer to the diagnosis of tuberculosis reactivation. The female patient's multiple peripheral lymphadenopathies and metastasis-suspicious lesions seen on positron emission tomography increased our suspicion of malignancy. However, in the final diagnostic process, the female patient was diagnosed with tuberculous lymphadenitis, and the male patient was diagnosed with sarcoidosis. We presented these two cases to show that it isn't always easy to distinguish tuberculosis and sarcoidosis with clinical, radiological, laboratory, and histopathological findings, and to draw attention to the importance of microbiological evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.