ReviewCureus2025
Identifying Gaps in Bolivian Neurosurgery: A Systematic Review and Proposed Framework for Resource Implementation.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying pediatric neurosurgery training priorities in Paraguay: a novel quadrant analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurosurgical systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often face challenges in infrastructure, technology, workforce, and continuity of care. Bolivia, an LMIC in South America, remains underrepresented in global neurosurgical research. Correspondingly, this study aimed to systematically review the neurosurgical literature of Bolivia to identify existing strengths, key gaps, and opportunities for targeted investment and technological implementation. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify studies reporting original data on neurosurgical care in Bolivia. Data were extracted across the following domains: study design, patient population, surgical volume, institutional capacity, technology access, outcomes, and reported barriers or recommendations. Descriptive statistics and thematic synthesis were used to characterize trends and identify priority areas. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, with a heavy research focus on pediatric neurosurgery (98% of study population). Public institutions represented 47% of centers, and 56% of services were urban based. Standard procedures included trauma and hydrocephalus management. Major system gaps included a lack of advanced surgical technology (neuronavigation absent in 46%, microsurgery in 36%), limited imaging access (64%), and high loss to follow-up (21%). Reported barriers spanned infrastructure, workforce, infection control, and delays in referral. Recommendations emphasized imaging expansion, surgical training, telemedicine, and protocol standardization. Neurosurgical care in Bolivia is characterized by concentrated pediatric research, variable infrastructure, and fragmented systems. This review identifies key opportunities for capacity-building and targeted collaboration to strengthen neurosurgical care in Bolivia and similar LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.