ArticleCureus2025
Proposal of Classification for Management of Molar Extraction Sockets and Decision Making for Immediate Implant Placement: A Technical Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomaterial strategies for precision regeneration of the tooth extraction socket: integrating site phenotype, pathological microenvironment, and healing sequence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In cases where adequate primary stability (PS) is established, the immediate implant placement (IIP) in molar sockets is considered a reliable treatment option that significantly reduces the overall treatment time. Several key factors contribute to the success of IIP in molar sockets, notably the presence of sufficient inter-radicular septa, which is essential for achieving the necessary PS in cases of elongated roots and also preventing buccal plate collapse. Furthermore, the properties of the buccal bone plate (BBP) may have a significant impact on the final morphology of the ridge following the healing period. This technical note aims to offer a classification system for multi-rooted molar sockets, along with treatment guidelines that consider crucial variables such as morphology, biological factors and the mechanical properties of the socket. The prevalent classification of molar sockets documented in the literature is based on the inter-radicular septum. This study introduces a different classification along with treatment recommendations aimed at enhancing the management of multi-rooted molar sockets during IIP. The proposed classification focuses on two critical variables: the presence of inter-radicular septa and BBP, to achieve optimal PS. According to the different conditions of the septal bone and buccal bone plate, the molar socket categorized into four distinct types - Type 1: Intact bony walls with intact septal bone; Type 2: Compromised bony walls while the septal bone remains intact; Type 3: Intact bony walls with a compromised septal bone; Type 4: Both bony walls and septal bone are compromised. This classification is crucial for understanding the structural integrity of molar sockets and guiding appropriate clinical interventions. This biomechanical classification emphasizes the beneficial role of the septal bone, along with the situations of the BBT, in preserving the vascular supply to the buccal plate, thereby reducing the risk of its collapse. This classification serves as a valuable framework for managing sockets during IIP. In all socket types, achieving PS is paramount for successful implant placement procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.