ReviewCureus2025
Infectious Disease Surveillance in the Era of Big Data and AI: Opportunities and Pitfalls.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The use of artificial intelligence based modelling techniques in One Health-related infectious disease studies in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Role of Digital Health Technologies and Artificial Intelligence in Modern Public Health Surveillance.Cureus · 2026Review
- AI Agents and Epidemic Intelligence on Respiratory Infectious Diseases: Toward a Conceptual Framework Integrating Decision Support.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Application of dimensionality reduction and clustering techniques for the analysis of Carrion's disease cases in the period 2000-2024.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Converging infectious disease threats in the post-COVID era: surveillance fragility, pandemic risk, and global preparedness.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for coordinating vaccine design, antiviral discovery, and real-world monitoring in the era of emerging and endemic viral threats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- From fragmented to integrated surveillance in LMICs: digital pathways for outbreak detection and vaccine intelligence.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The landscape of infectious disease surveillance (IDS) is undergoing a profound shift, driven by the rapid emergence of big data and artificial intelligence (AI). Traditional surveillance systems, while foundational to public health, are increasingly limited by delayed reporting, data silos, and fragmented information flows. In response to these limitations, the integration of AI and big data offers new possibilities for enhancing disease detection, monitoring, and response strategies on both local and global scales. This review explores the potential of AI-enabled tools and big data systems to support early outbreak detection, real-time surveillance, and predictive modeling. These technologies facilitate the synthesis of diverse datasets, including clinical, genomic, geospatial, and environmental information, enabling a more holistic understanding of disease patterns. Additionally, AI contributes to improved diagnostic accuracy and optimized resource allocation, which are critical during public health emergencies. However, the adoption of these technologies has not been without challenges. Concerns about data privacy, equity in access, algorithmic bias, and over-reliance on automated systems present significant ethical and operational hurdles. In low-resource settings, limited digital infrastructure further complicates implementation. The review also highlights real-world applications from recent outbreaks, such as COVID-19, influenza, and Zika, to demonstrate both the promise and the limitations of AI-driven surveillance. To move forward responsibly, public health systems must adopt a balanced approach that integrates AI capabilities with human oversight. Strategic investment, cross-sector collaboration, and the development of clear ethical frameworks are essential to unlocking the full potential of big data and AI in infectious disease surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.