Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200529›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025

Healthcare providers' perception about challenges of reproductive health service utilisation.

Meaza G Sileshi, Lebitsi M Modiba, Portia J Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meaza G SileshiDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4996-2265
Lebitsi M ModibaDepartment of Health Studies, Faculty of Human Science, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7351-2168
Portia J JordanDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-3221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reproductive health service maintains optimal health and reduces missed opportunities for seropositive women. But it is reported that the service uptake is not adequately recognised. Aim: This study helped to explore healthcare providers' perceived challenges of reproductive health service utilisation by seropositive women. Setting: This study was conducted in Addis Ababa, June 2021. Methods: Qualitative-exploratory research design was carried out. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) programme representative health professionals ( Result: Participants' mean age was 30.14 years; 12 (54.5%) of them were nurses, and 11 (50%) of them worked for 2-4 years. Low reproductive healthcare utilisation was related to the vertical care delivery approach to HIV, lack of clear guidance for providing multidimensional care, technical skill gaps and the low caring attitude of health professionals. Another factor that lessens reproductive health use was seropositive women's fear of status disclosure, interest for only HIV care or demanding additional incentives for newly introduced care. Conclusion: Reproductive health service is inadequately utilised by seropositive women due to several reasons and causes inefficient opportunities to care. Contribution: This study helps for task-shifting and to design reproductive health components integration with HIV care that ensures comprehensive service to these target population.

Indexed as

care providerschallengesperceptionreproductive healthservice utilisation

Identifiers

PMID41200529
PMCPMC12587190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.