ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025
Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among medical laboratory workers in South Africa.
Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global vaccine development.Nature medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, medical laboratory workers had a higher risk of contracting COVID-19 compared to the general population. Aim: To assess the COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy among medical laboratory workers in South Africa in 2022. Setting: In South Africa among the healthcare worker population at the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) in 2022. Methods: Descriptive statistics was used to identify the reasons for COVID-19 acceptance. We examined the association between COVID-19 acceptance and other socio-demographic factors using logistic regression analyses to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among NHLS workers was 82.8%. Most of the participants reported that their reason for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was mainly to protect their family (62.6%) and to protect themselves (50.2%), and they perceived the vaccine to be safe (40.7%). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was mainly because the participants reported that there was very little research done on the vaccine (41.4%) and some were worried about the vaccine side effects (31.4%). Increased COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was associated with age, 40-49 years (OR: 5.35 [95% CI: 1.42-20.10]) and 50-59 years (OR: 11.0 [95% CI: 1.63-74.92]). Decreased COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was associated with black people (OR: 0.15 [95% CI: 0.03-0.89]). Conclusion: The prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among medical laboratory workers was notably high. Contribution: This study contributes to the body of knowledge on vaccine acceptance and hesitancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.