ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
YOLO-lychee-advanced: an optimized detection model for lychee pest damage based on YOLOv11.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-Based Assessment of External Quality Traits in Chinese Bayberry (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- EP-YOLO: An Enhanced Lightweight Model for Micro-Pest Detection in Agricultural Light-Trap Environments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce YOLO-Lychee-advanced, a lightweight and high-precision detector for lychee stem-borer damage on fruit surfaces. Built on YOLOv11, the model incorporates (i) a C2f module with dual-branch residual connections to capture fine-grained features of pest holes ≤2 mm, (ii) a CBAM channel-spatial attention block to suppress complex peel-texture interference, and (iii) CIoU loss to tighten bounding-box regression. To mitigate illumination variance, we augment the original 3,061-image dataset to 9,183 samples by simulating direct/back-lighting and adopt a "pest-hole only" annotation strategy, which improves mAP50-95 by 18% over baseline. Experiments conducted on an RTX 3060 with a batch size of 32 and an input size of 416 × 416 pixels show YOLO-Lychee-advanced achieves 92.2% precision, 85.4% recall, 91.7% mAP50, and 61.6% mAP50-95, surpassing YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n by 3.4% and 1.7%, respectively, while maintaining 37 FPS real-time speed. Compared with the recent YOLOv9t and YOLOv10n baselines on the same lychee test set, YOLO-Lychee-advanced raises mAP50-95 by 3.4% and 1.7%, respectively. Post-processing optimization further boosts precision to 95.5%. A publicly available dataset and PyQt5 visualization tool are provided at https://github.com/Suxueping/Lychee-Pest-Damage-images.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.