ArticleNature and science of sleep2025
AI-Assisted Awake Endoscopic Video Analysis for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Detection.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for sleep-disordered breathing: a taxonomy of methods, data modalities, and clinical applications.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder characterized by upper airway obstruction during sleep, leading to hypoxia and serious health consequences. Conventional diagnostic methods such as polysomnography and drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) are often costly, invasive, or time-consuming. This study aimed to develop a safe, rapid, and fully automated AI-assisted platform for OSA detection using nasopharyngoscopic videos acquired during wakefulness, and to propose diagnostic criteria comparable to the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Methods: Flexible nasopharyngoscopic videos of supine, awake patients were analyzed using an AI system comprising four Xception-based image classifiers to identify scan boundaries and classify anatomical regions (nasopharynx, velopharyngeal/oropharyngeal \[VO] wall, tongue base, and epiglottis \[TE]). Five U-Net-based semantic segmentation models were then applied to extract quantitative airway features. Key variables-including maximum and minimum airway cross-sectional areas, VO wall area ratio, and TE ratio-were entered into a support vector regression model to predict OSA. A total of 103 clinical samples (59 non-OSA, 44 OSA) were analyzed, with 35 cases reserved for testing. Results: Classification accuracy for nostril, VO/TE, vocal fold, and nasopharynx regions was 100%, 95.8%, 95%, and 98.5%, respectively. The mean intersection over union (IoU) for segmentation models reached 82.72%. The prediction model achieved 97.14% accuracy on the test set. OSA-associated thresholds were identified-VO wall area ratio < 0.41 and TE ratio > 36.97-all comparable to AHI-based diagnosis. The complete diagnostic workflow, including video upload, classification, segmentation, and prediction, was completed in an average of 85 seconds. Conclusion: This study is the first to implement a fully automated, AI-based dynamic endoscopic video analysis for OSA detection in awake patients. The system accurately predicts OSA and localizes potential obstruction sites in a non-invasive, real-time manner, offering a practical outpatient screening tool to help select candidates who require further evaluation with polysomnography or DISE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.