ArticleNursing research and practice2025
Evaluation of Training on Coping With Perinatal Loss on Undergraduate Midwifery Students' Competence in Bereavement Care.
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To determine participants' pre- and post-training competence in perinatal bereavement care, along with evaluation of the training. Methods: A quasi-experimental study with a pre-post design was conducted in two phases. The training on coping with perinatal loss (TCPL) was first delivered entirely online to a cohort of students in 2022( Results: Including 52 junior undergraduate midwifery students in 2022 and 44 in 2023 completed the questionnaires. We observed higher post-training scores for perinatal bereavement care competence and stress-related growth, and a high degree of satisfaction in the scenario of simulations. Conclusions: The results support the feasibility of the training and are consistent with short-term improvements; confirmatory controlled studies are warranted. Trial Registration: Chinese Registry of Clinical Trials: ChiCTR2200066048.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.