Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200441›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025

Acupuncture for post-stroke hiccup: an overview of systematic reviews.

Xin-Xin Liu, Ying-Qi Ma, You-Zhu Su, Ling-Yao Kong, Chen Shen, Jian-Ping Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin-Xin LiuCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ying-Qi MaSchool of Basic Medical Sciences, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
You-Zhu SuCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ling-Yao KongCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chen ShenCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jian-Ping LiuCentre for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to describe and summarize the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of post-stroke hiccup and to provide a reference for clinical practice and future research. Methods: We conducted a systematic search across eight electronic databases from their inception up to February 2025. This search encompassed systematic reviews focusing on acupuncture for post-stroke hiccup. The methodological quality was assessed using the AMSTAR 2. The corrected coverage area was used to calculate the degree of overlap of the original studies. The evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results: Of the 10 eligible systematic reviews included, the methodological quality was evaluated as 1 (10.00%) low and 9 (90.00%) very low quality. The corrected coverage area of the preliminary studies was moderate or high overlap. Acupuncture may alleviate hiccups symptoms and improve the quality of life (certainty: moderate to very low). Safety data were limited and insufficient to draw firm conclusions. Conclusion: Acupuncture may be a potential intervention for the treatment of a post-stroke hiccup. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the methodological shortcomings and low evidence quality observed in current systematic reviews. There is an urgent need for more well-designed, high-quality randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

acupuncturemethodological qualityoverview of systematic reviewspost-stroke hiccupquality of evidencequality of life

Identifiers

PMID41200441
PMCPMC12588814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.