ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Restoring ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in athletes: an individualized clinical decision-making system.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Changes in balance performance and Its determining factors in the lower leg during the competition season in adolescent football players.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion plays a pivotal biomechanical role within the lower limb with implications both in rehabilitation, injury risk reduction and athletic performance. However, clinicians often lack practical guidance on diagnosing and differentiating the various joints or structures that have been shown to have a role in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion restriction. Clinical question: To move beyond the "one size fits all approach" paradigm in musculoskeletal rehabilitation, we propose addressing the 2 following questions: (1) How can clinician utilize the weight-bearing lunge test findings to develop a clinical-decision making system for ankle dorsiflexion range of motion assessment? and (2) How can this system guide individualized interventions to restore ankle dorsiflexion range of motion specific to each athlete's needs?. Solutions: We outline a 3-step framework for improving ankle dorsiflexion range of motion restriction: (1) having a quantitative and qualitative assessment using the weight-bearing lunge test to identify joint or structure involvement, (2) having confirmatory diagnostic testing to pinpoint mobility restrictions of the joint or structures involved, and (3) proposing targeted interventions based on individual findings, ensuring a personalized rehabilitation approach rather than a generalized global protocol. Clinical application: This rehabilitation practice commentary addresses a notable gap in the existing literature on clinical choices regarding ankle dorsiflexion restriction treatment. By integrating this individual clinical decision-making system, clinicians can enhance rehabilitation and performance optimization beyond standard treatment methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.