ArticleRSC advances2025
Interplay of matrix porosity and phase interfaces in lithium-ion transport of Sn-CS nanocomposites.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tin-carbon-silica (Sn-CS) nanocomposites are promising anode materials for lithium-ion batteries owing to their high theoretical capacity and structural stability. However, their performance is critically influenced by matrix porosity and interfacial transport barriers. In this work, a three-dimensional multiphysics model was developed to elucidate lithium-ion diffusion and charge transport across tin, carbon, and silica phases. The simulations reveal that an intermediate porosity of ∼40% offers the best balance between ionic mobility and structural integrity, while excessive porosity disrupts electronic pathways and low porosity limits electrolyte infiltration. Phase-resolved analysis highlights tin as the most efficient diffusion medium, whereas silica interfaces create significant bottlenecks that induce steep lithium concentration gradients and up to 20% capacity loss at high charge rates. Model validation against experimental data confirms the accuracy of the predictions. These findings demonstrate that tuning porosity and interfacial architecture can effectively mitigate diffusion limitations, providing a rational design strategy for next-generation Sn-based nanocomposites. Beyond anodes, the presented multiphysics approach offers a generalizable framework for understanding and optimizing transport processes in multifunctional nanostructured materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.