Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200355›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Prevalence of

Velina Dinkova, Nikolina Rusenova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Velina DinkovaDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.
Nikolina RusenovaDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology, Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Trakia University, Stara Zagora, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aim: This single-center retrospective study was designed to investigate the prevalence of Methods: Swab samples of ear, nasal, conjunctival, throat discharges, wound, abscess, and fistula discharges, and skin lesion fluid were collected from dogs with clinical inflammation using sterile cotton applicators, immediately transferred to Stuart transport medium, and inoculated on different culture media within 24 hours. The presence of microorganisms was reported based on isolation in pure culture or as the predominant isolate in a mixed culture. The yeasts were identified by the specific growth morphology of colonies and cell morphology. Data analysis included the year of isolation, sampling site, and microbial pathogen genus. The differences in the prevalence of yeasts according to the sampling site were assessed using the chi-square test and test of independent proportions. Results: During 2019-2023, the microbiological examination of 896 swab samples from dogs with clinical signs of inflammation referred to the University Veterinary Hospital, Stara Zagora, resulted in 201 unique Conclusion: The relatively constant presence of

Indexed as

DermatomycosesDog DiseasesMalasseziaAnimalsCoinfectionDogsFemaleHospitals, AnimalMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesCanine clinical samplesOtitisSkin lesionsYeasts

Identifiers

PMID41200355
PMCPMC12587832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.