Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200346›Full record

ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025

Nurasmi Nurasmi, Wasmen Manalu, I Ketut Mudite Adnyane, Andriyanto Andriyanto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nurasmi NurasmiDivision of Physiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Wasmen ManaluDivision of Physiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
I Ketut Mudite AdnyaneDivision of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.
Andriyanto AndriyantoDivision of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Productivity is primarily determined by the ability of the mother to produce healthy, strong, and optimally developed offspring from the zygote to birth, ultimately improving postnatal growth and health. The mother's health is a primary support system in reproductive health, as reflected in the values of body weight, estrogen and progesterone, uterus, ovaries, and vascularization, all of which are crucial in enhancing reproductive performance. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of Methods: Nulliparous and sexually mature female Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to an experimental study with a completely randomized design. Female virgin rats weighing 150-200 g were divided into seven dose groups: P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, and P7. Each group of virgin female rats was given a predetermined treatment dose. The main ingredients of the treatment feed are fishmeal, Results: The results showed increased estrogen and progesterone levels in the Conclusion: Additionally, maternal vascularization increased after supplementation treatment. Rats' body weight before and after pregnancy did not differ significantly across all treatments (

Indexed as

Chlorella vulgarisEstrogensProgesteroneReproductionAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFemaleOvaryPregnancyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyUterusEstrogensProgesteroneChlorella vulgarisHarpodon nehereusHormoneReproductive

Identifiers

PMID41200346
PMCPMC12587866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.