ReviewMedComm2025
Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.
Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence models in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Pooled it
- A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Large Language Model Framework for Predicting Postoperative Neurological Complications in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Model Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Taking High-Tech to the Field: Leukemia Diagnosis in Pediatric Mexican Patients from Vulnerable and Remote Regions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genomic innovations in cancer prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and precision therapeutics.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Cisplatin resistance in oral squamous cell carcinoma: mechanisms, reversal strategies, and emerging technologies.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer continues to be one of the primary causes of death worldwide. Although there has been substantial progress in clinical cancer care, the outcomes for cancer patients still remain poor. The rapid advancements of artificial intelligence (AI) will revolutionize cancer management by addressing current obstacles in oncology research and practice, ultimately enhancing healthcare accuracy and patient outcomes. Increasing evidence demonstrates that AI-based models can improve the accuracy and efficiency of cancer diagnosis and treatment by leveraging multilayer data. Cancer patients could greatly benefit from AI's promising prospects, yet few AI models have been authorized for clinical use. A comprehensive understanding of AI's basic principles, applications, and potential impacts is essential to foster its clinical translation. In this review, we provide an overview of fundamental AI techniques, encompassing machine learning and deep learning. Moreover, we summarize recent studies on AI's transformative role in cancer diagnosis, classification, and personalized treatment planning. Furthermore, we discuss the current challenges that hinder the widespread use of AI, propose potential solutions, and outline future directions. Overall, through systematic analysis of existing preclinical and clinical evidence, this review highlights the substantial potential of AI technology and provides valuable guidance for future research in AI-driven oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.