ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Going Mobile: Using Portable Genomic Technologies for PCR-Free In Situ Species Identification and Real-Time Molecular Systematics.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Across the globe, anthropogenic environmental changes are threatening animal biodiversity and contributing to the emergence of vector-borne and zoonotic pathogens through host range shifts. To combat these challenges, accurate and timely biodiversity assessments and molecular species monitoring efforts are critical. Here, we document how the implementation of a portable laboratory in combination with targeted long-read nanopore sequencing can facilitate in situ genomic and systematic analyses across several animal taxa. Working at two ecologically divergent field sites in Guyana, South America, we collected small mammals and blood-feeding insects, including bats, rodents, a marsupial, mosquitoes, and a phlebotomine sand fly. For each specimen sampled, genomic DNA was extracted in the field and used for the preparation of nanopore sequencing libraries. For field sequencing, we utilized a novel software-based targeted sequencing approach-nanopore adaptive sampling (NAS)-that enabled the selective sequencing of mitochondrial reads using mitogenome assemblies of related taxa as enrichment targets. Basecalled reads from our field sequencing experiments were used to assemble complete mitogenomes and to generate mitochondrial biomarker consensus gene sequences for all nine small mammals and four blood-feeding insects sequenced. Confirmatory molecular identifications were made with a combination of local nucleotide BLAST queries and maximum likelihood analyses using biomarker consensus sequences. Importantly, the mitogenome-based targeted sequencing strategies outlined here are amplification-free and allowed us to bypass time-consuming and potentially troublesome PCR-based methods in the field, streamlining library preparation, sequencing experiments, and on-site analyses. Our findings describe targeted sequencing with NAS as an effective tool for implementation into portable laboratories to widely enhance field-based biodiversity monitoring and rapid molecular species assessments across vertebrate and invertebrate hosts of consequential emerging pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.