ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Striatal and hippocampal contributions to instrumental learning in the mouse using high-resolution behavioral monitoring and fMRI.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dopamine release-associated striatal blood oxygenation and whole-brain dynamics during associative learning.Science advances · 2026Article
- The Periaqueductal Gray Selectively Supports Reversal Learning During a Flexible Discrimination Task in Mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Surface mapping of gastric motor functions using MRI: a comparative study between humans and rats.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mammalian brain orchestrates goal-directed behavior through complex interactions between multiple memory systems, with the striatum and hippocampus playing pivotal interrelated roles. A central open question is the extent to which distinct memory signals from these systems drive learning to achieve desired goals and, once those are learned, maintain performance. Here, we used an MRI-compatible platform to obtain whole-brain functional imaging of head-fixed mice as they learn to perform a lick go/no-go odor discrimination task from the naïve state to task proficiency. Behaving mouse functional MRI (fMRI) acquired over a period of several days allowed us to characterize distributed activity as the animals learned the task, demonstrating differential involvement of the striatal and hippocampal memory systems accounting for correct and incorrect task responses. A consideration of the contribution of striatal sub-regions revealed that the responses of the dorsal striatum were correlated with improvement in reaction time, while responses in the ventral striatum were correlated with learning the task and maintaining task performance. In contrast, the dorsal hippocampus showed depressed responses to correct licks to the target odor (hits) and increased responses to incorrect licks to the non-target odor (false alarms). False alarms that were correlated with positive hippocampal responses had longer reaction times and emerged after the mouse learned the task, implicating the hippocampus in driving false memory responses. These results show that behaviorally beneficial actions were correlated with the striatum with a competing involvement of the hippocampus driving erroneous actions, setting the stage to study circuit-based mechanisms of false memory in the mouse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.