SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Depression and depressive symptoms in physicians prior to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental health disorders, such as depression, can significantly impact a physician's well-being and the quality of care they provide. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors and to estimate the prevalence of depression and depressive symptoms in physicians prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis searched EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, and MEDLINE databases for studies published between January 2002 and March 2020 (pre-COVID-19 period). Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cohort and cross-sectional studies. We included studies of physicians where depression/depressive symptoms were measured by either a validated questionnaire or clinical diagnosis. The primary and secondary outcomes measures included assessing the prevalence of depression/depressive symptoms, and whether depression differed by pertinent risk factors (study design, sex, specialty, training stage) in the literature prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Forty-two studies from 14 countries involving 27,284 physicians (7,293 with depression or depressive symptoms) were included. The pooled prevalence estimate was 34.2% (95% CI: 26.4-43.0%), with substantial heterogeneity identified across studies (I Conclusions: In this review examining depression and depressive symptoms among physicians, we report a pooled estimate of 34% prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity in study design and limited examination of key risk factors, limited conclusions can be made regarding the true prevalence across the physicians, and how best to target interventions. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021232814.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.