Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2025
Trends in allergen-reactive CRTH2+ T cells and TARC associated with successful outcomes in a phase 2 cashew oral immunotherapy study.
Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03504774 (T Cell Reagent Research for Monitoring T Cells in Food Allergy), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
T Cell Reagent Research for Monitoring T Cells in Food Allergy (MOTIF) Phase 2 Study Using Food Allergen Oral Immunotherapy for Shrimp or Cashew Allergies
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We designed an oral immunotherapy (OIT) clinical trial for cashew allergy to further our understanding of immunological responses with treatment, including changes in allergen-specific T cells. This information can further assist with the design of efficacious and safe treatments. Methods: Participants were built up to and maintained on 1 g of cashew flour protein. Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) were conducted before and after dosing completion (week 52) and 6 weeks after dosing discontinuation (week 58). Desensitization (DS) and sustained unresponsiveness (SU) were defined as tolerating DBPCFC to a cumulative dose of 2043 mg of the allergen at weeks 52 and 58, respectively. ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03504774. Results: We enrolled 40 cashew allergic participants. In the Intent-to-treat (ITT) population, both the DS and SU rate to cashew was 65% (26/40). Among cashew-reactive cells, CRTH2 Conclusion: Cashew OIT have efficacy and safety outcomes similar to other published OIT studies. Reductions in pathogenic allergen-specific T cell populations may contribute to the immune mechanisms underlying tolerance achieved towards cashew post-treatment. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03504774.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.