ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
NeoTImmuML: a machine learning-based prediction model for human tumor neoantigen immunogenicity.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven neoantigen identification: a comprehensive review from somatic variant calling to T cell recognition.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- From Neoantigens to Nanocarriers: Modern Methods and Modalities in Using Peptides for Cancer Vaccination.Biochemistry · 2026Review
- iPepGen: a modular, immunopeptidogenomic analysis pipeline for discovery, verification, and prioritization of cancer peptide neoantigen candidates.Genome biology · 2026Article
- From thresholds to trajectories: a perspective on reframing alloimmune risk for computational modeling in solid organ transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Computational identification of B- and T-cell epitopes: a unified task taxonomy and review of databases, datasets, predictive pipelines, and gaps.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tumor neoantigens possess high specificity and immunogenicity, making them crucial targets for personalized cancer immunotherapies such as mRNA vaccines and T-cell therapies. However, experimental identification and evaluation of their immunogenicity are time-consuming, which limits the efficiency of vaccine development. Methods: To address these challenges, we implemented two key strategies. First, we upgraded the TumorAgDB database by integrating publicly available neoantigen data from the past two years, resulting in TumorAgDB2.0. Second, we developed NeoTImmuML, a weighted ensemble machine learning model for predicting neoantigen immunogenicity. Using data from TumorAgDB2.0, we calculated the physicochemical properties of peptides and systematically evaluated eight machine learning algorithms via five-fold cross-validation. The top-performing algorithms - LightGBM, XGBoost, and Random Forest - were integrated into a weighted ensemble model. Results: TumorAgDB2.0 (https://tumoragdb.com.cn) now contains 187,223 entries. Moreover, NeoTImmuML demonstrated strong generalization performance on both internal and external test datasets. SHAP feature importance analysis revealed that peptide hydrophilicity and length are key determinants of immunogenicity. Discussion: TumorAgDB2.0 provides a comprehensive data resource for neoantigen research, while NeoTImmuML offers an efficient and interpretable tool for predicting neoantigen immunogenicity. Together, they offer valuable support for the design of personalized neoantigen vaccines and the development of cancer immunotherapy strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.