ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Optimizing early-phase immunotherapy trials: the role of biomarker enrichment strategies.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanomaterials for the Prevention, Detection, and Treatment of Pharyngeal Human Papillomavirus Infection: A Translational Roadmap.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Psychological distress as a putative host-state determinant of cancer immunotherapy response.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- CD24 as an innate immune checkpoint in solid tumors: biology, biomarker stratification, and therapeutic translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Tryptophan metabolism at the crossroads of the neuro-immuno-microbial axis: implications for precision medicine in chronic diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of solid tumors; however, their clinical efficacy remains limited to a subset of patients. Novel immunotherapy agents are being investigated in phase I clinical trials, with an increasing focus on biomarker selection strategies to optimize patient outcomes. Prior evidence suggests that biomarker-selected tumors may have better outcomes when treated with molecularly-guided therapies. However, the high complexity of tumor-host interactions and inter-patient variability indicates that a one-size-fits-all biomarker approach is unlikely to be sufficient in the immunotherapy landscape. This review highlights current biomarker-enrichment strategies in immunotherapy early drug development, addressing challenges and potential future directions for their effective implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.