Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200134›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2024

Contrastive dimension reduction: when and how?

Sam Hawke, YueEn Ma, Didong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Contrastive Dimension Reduction: A Systematic Review.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sam HawkeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
YueEn MaDepartment of Statistics & Operations Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Didong LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Study of Selective Cell and System Vulnerability in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG079291 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Li Gan, Yun Li · 2023 to 2026
$5.4M
Semiparametric Analysis of Big Censored DataR01HL149683 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LIN, DANYU · 2020 to 2023
$1.9M
Robust Computational and Data Analytic Tools for In-depth Understanding Postoperative Pain Mechanism with Enhanced Pain Management and Clinical Decision MakingR01LM014407 · NLM · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Baiming Zou · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
Novel Deep Learning Tools for Clinical Decision Support in Postoperative Pain ManagementR56LM013784 · NLM · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZOU, BAIMING · 2022 to 2023
$832k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149683NIA NIH HHS R01 AG079291NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014407NLM NIH HHS R56 LM013784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dimension reduction (DR) is an important and widely studied technique in exploratory data analysis. However, traditional DR methods are not applicable to datasets with a contrastive structure, where data are split into a foreground group of interest (case or treatment group), and a background group (control group). This type of data, common in biomedical studies, necessitates contrastive dimension reduction (CDR) methods to effectively capture information unique to or enriched in the foreground group relative to the background group. Despite the development of various CDR methods, two critical questions remain underexplored: when should these methods be applied, and how can the information unique to the foreground group be quantified? In this work, we address these gaps by proposing a hypothesis test to determine the existence of contrastive information, and introducing a contrastive dimension estimator (CDE) to quantify the unique components in the foreground group. We provide theoretical support for our methods and validate their effectiveness through extensive simulated, semi-simulated, and real experiments involving images, gene expressions, protein expressions, and medical sensors, demonstrating their ability to identify the unique information in the foreground group.

Identifiers

PMID41200134
PMCPMC12587890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.