ArticleHealth science reports2025
Predicting Child Development Across Literacy, Physical, Learning, and Social-Emotional Domains Using Supervised Machine Learning: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on MICS 2019 Bangladesh.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Early childhood development (ECD) plays a vital role in shaping a child's health and well-being, influenced by child, family, and environmental factors. To prevent long-term impairments, early detection and intervention are crucial. Using MICS 2019 data, this study applies supervised machine learning to predict ECD across four key domains and identify the most significant predictors and economic strategies. Methods: In this study, using data of 9346 children obtained from Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) 2019, we evaluated and compared five classifiers: CART, Random Forest, XGBoost, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machines (SVM). We have addressed four early developmental domains as our target variables: literacy, numeracy, physics, learning, and social-emotional development of children. Five-fold cross-validation was used to ensure appropriate test error rate estimations and reduce bias. To handle the data imbalance, the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) is used. Results: The analysis shows that most children are developing normally in the learning (90.58%) and physical (98.70%) domains, while delays are highest in literacy-numeracy (71.37%) and social-emotional (27.57%) domains. Among the machine learning models evaluated, Random Forest consistently performed best across all domains, achieving the highest accuracy, particularly in learning (0.83) and physical (0.97) domains. Feature importance analysis identified maternal education, child age, regional location (Division), and socioeconomic status (Wealth Index) as key predictors. Early childhood education and books read at home also play important roles in cognitive and learning outcomes, guiding targeted interventions for child development. Conclusions: The results show notable differences in early childhood development, particularly in social-emotional and literacy-numeracy domains. Socioeconomic status, early learning experiences, and parental education are key predictors, while physical and social-emotional development are influenced by resources, regional factors, and nutrition. These findings can guide targeted interventions and policies for holistic child development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.