ArticleAnesthesiology research and practice2025
Comparison of Anesthetic and Surgical Outcomes Between General Anesthesia and Dexmedetomidine-Based Sedoanalgesia in Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery With Bispectral Index Monitoring.
Article in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05397301 (Comparison of Controlled Sedoanalgesia and General Anesthesia in Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Controlled Sedoanalgesia and General Anesthesia in Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Anesthetic and Surgical Outcomes Between General Anesthesia and Dexmedetomidine-Based Sedoanalgesia in Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery With Bispectral Index Monitoring.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to compare general anesthesia (GA) and sedoanalgesia (SA) with dexmedetomidine in terms of anesthetic and surgical outcomes in dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) under bispectral index (BIS) monitoring. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled study, 44 adult patients (≥ 18 y) were divided into two groups. Standard GA was induced in the GA group ( Results: The hemodynamic parameters, amount of intraoperative bleeding, duration of anesthesia and surgery, postoperative pain score, complications, and patient and surgeon satisfaction were similar between the two groups. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the SA group ( Conclusions: This study suggests that SA with dexmedetomidine accompanied by BIS monitoring can be an alternative to GA in selected patients undergoing external DCR surgery, because the anesthetic and surgical processes are similar to those of GA, and patient satisfaction is higher than that with GA. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05397301.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.