Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200120›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of lifestyle medicine2025

Plant-Based Nutrition and Supplements for Optimal Athletic Performance.

Richard M Rosenfeld, Samantha Zinman, Jonathan P Bonnet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of lifestyle medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Lifestyle Medicine and Healthy Nutrition.American journal of lifestyle medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Nutritional and Antioxidant Profile of BrownMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard M RosenfeldDepartment of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA (RMR).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-3795
Samantha ZinmanCollege of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA (SZ).
Jonathan P BonnetPrimary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA (JPB).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-0048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concurrently with an exploding interest in the health benefits of a plant-based eating pattern is similar interest in how this pattern could affect athletic performance. In this state-of-the-art review we summarize the current best research on plant-based nutrition and supplements for athletic performance, emphasizing systematic reviews, randomized trials, and comparative studies. A plant-based eating pattern (little or no animal products) is non-inferior to an omnivore diet (no restrictions on meat, dairy, or other animal products) for athletic performance and for muscle protein synthesis when macronutrient content is similar. When sufficient total protein is consumed, plant-based sources are non-inferior to animal-based sources. Most athletes ideally need 1.2 to 2.0 grams/kg of body weight/day of protein, preferably split across 3-4 meals to optimize muscle protein synthesis and recovery. Supplements can offer small added benefits, with the strongest evidence for improved performance from caffeine, creatine, protein, and essential amino acids, and the strongest evidence for improved recovery from polyphenols, vitamin E, omega-3 fatty acids. We also discuss plant protein sources, special considerations for masters athletes, and other evidence-based supplements. Our goals are to highlight core principles of plant-based nutrition and supplements while also offering pragmatic advice for athletes of all ages and abilities.

Indexed as

athletic performanceergogenic supplementslifestyle medicinemuscle proteinplant-based nutritionsynthesis

Identifiers

PMID41200120
PMCPMC12586379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.