ArticleAfrican journal of disability2025
A Braille Trail for all: Inclusive design in the Karoo Desert National Botanical Garden.
Article in African journal of disability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Disability-inclusive public green spaces are vital for universal accessibility and for enhancing accessible tourism. Integrating multisensory stimuli with information and communication technologies fosters inclusive, sustainable, interactive, and site-specific tourism experiences. Objectives: The objective of this article is to present the development of the Braille Trail in the Karoo Desert National Botanical Garden (KDNBG), South Africa, highlighting how participatory design, inclusive multisensory gardens and locative literature foster accessible tourism experiences, while addressing gaps in the literature on sensory and wellbeing gardens from a Global South perspective. Method: A qualitative, practice-based, and participatory approach was adopted, grounded in principles of collaborative, community-based research. Semi-structured interviews, guided by a thematic framework, elicited insights from participants directly involved in the project. The authors' practice-based contributions complemented these findings. Results: The design and establishment of the Braille Trail involved collaboration between Garden management and staff, visually impaired persons, service organisations, institutional partners, and creative contributors. This inclusive process ensured that the trail reflected the needs, experiences, and expectations of its intended users. Conclusion: The Braille Trail integrates sensory garden design, accessibility, and diverse communication technologies - including digital platforms and locative literature - while incorporating indigenous elements to enrich visitor experiences. Continued community engagement, together with lessons drawn from successes and challenges, provides guidance for sustaining and extending inclusive design in future projects. Contribution: This study offers insight into multisensory gardens and accessible tourism in a Global South context, demonstrating the application of universal and inclusive design, co-design, slow tourism, accessible communication technologies, and collaborative approaches to create engaging and accessible visitor experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.