Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41200001›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Stakeholders' perspectives of dental imaging in the current diagnostic radiography curriculum.

Keshini Govindasami, Shenuka Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keshini GovindasamiDiscipline of Public Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6276-055X
Shenuka SinghDiscipline of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4842-602X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dental imaging supports accurate diagnosis of orofacial anomalies and is included in diagnostic radiography training in South Africa (SA). Yet, there is limited published evidence on these professionals' competencies to perform such tasks. It is unclear whether dental imaging is explicitly expressed in the undergraduate curricula for diagnostic radiography. Aim: To explore stakeholder perspectives (academics and Radiography and Clinical Technology [RCT] board members) on the provision of dental imaging within the current scope of practice and training for diagnostic radiographers, and to conduct a document analysis. Setting: In three selected provinces in SA: KwaZulu-Natal, Gauteng and Western Cape. Methods: An in-depth descriptive case study using exploratory, interpretivist design was conducted with purposively selected academics ( Results: Key themes included the perceived understanding of the dental imaging scope of practice, training and limited exposure to undergraduate dental imaging training affects skills development. The limited availability of publicly accessible training documents created an unclear picture of the extent to which dental imaging is incorporated into the undergraduate curriculum. Conclusion: Noted inconsistencies between participants' perspectives and the findings from document analysis, highlighting the need for greater stakeholder engagement and collaboration to define how dental imaging should be taught. Contribution: This study underscores the critical need for stakeholder collaboration in aligning dental imaging training and practice for diagnostic radiography.

Indexed as

dental radiography trainingdocument reviewscope of practicestakeholder engagement and collaborationundergraduate curriculum

Identifiers

PMID41200001
PMCPMC12587061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.