Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199982›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Versus Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Superficial Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Takuo Takehana, Tsuneo Oyama, Motohiko Kato, Shunsuke Yoshii, Shu Hoteya, Satoru Nonaka, Shoichi Yoshimizu, Masao Yoshida, Ken Ohata, Hironori Yamamoto and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Takuo TakehanaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center Nagano Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9831-9091
Tsuneo OyamaDepartment of Endoscopy Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center Nagano Japan.
Motohiko KatoCenter for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-1316
Shunsuke YoshiiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan.
Shu HoteyaDepartment of Gastroenterology Toranomon Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Satoru NonakaEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Shoichi YoshimizuDepartment of Gastroenterology Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan.
Masao YoshidaDivision of Endoscopy Shizuoka Cancer Center Shizuoka Japan.
Ken OhataDepartment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy NTT Medical Center Tokyo Tokyo Japan.
Hironori YamamotoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology Jichi Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Yuko HaraDepartment of Endoscopy The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Shigetsugu TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital Kanazawa Japan.
Osamu DohiMolecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Yasushi YamasakiDepartment of Gastroenterology Okayama University Hospital Okayama Japan.
Hiroya UeyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Koichi KuraharaDivision of Gastroenterology Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital Matsuyama Japan.
Tomoaki TashimaDepartment of Gastroenterology Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Nobutsugu AbeDepartment of Gastroenterological and General Surgery Kyorin University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Atsushi NakayamaDivision of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Ichiro OdaEndoscopy Division National Cancer Center Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Naohisa YahagiDivision of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological features and short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for superficial duodenal epithelial tumors (SDETs) and investigate the risk factors for severe adverse events (AEs). Methods: Overall, 1017 patients who underwent ESD and 62 who underwent LECS to treat suspected SDETs between January 2008 and December 2018 were included. After comparing surgical and postsurgical outcomes between the two groups, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors of AEs. Results: The lesion size was significantly larger in the LECS group than in the ESD group (28.5 vs. 20.8 mm, Conclusions: Both ESD and LECS showed similar AE rates, although LECS is likely to be indicated for larger and wider circumferential tumors. Only incomplete closure of the resected wound was an independent risk factor for severe AEs, such as delayed perforation and bleeding.

Indexed as

adverse eventendoscopic submucosal dissectionlaparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgerysuperficial duodenal epithelial tumor

Identifiers

PMID41199982
PMCPMC12586948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.