Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199980›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surgical Results of Hand-Sewn Versus Stapled Anastomosis for Lower Rectal Cancer Located 4-5 cm From the Anal Verge: A Subanalysis of the Ultimate Study.

Masakatsu Numata, Jun Watanabe, Yuichiro Tsukada, Yusuke Suwa, Yosuke Fukunaga, Yasumitsu Hirano, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Hiroki Hamamoto, Masanori Yoshimitsu, Hisanaga Horie and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Sexual dysfunction outcomes and reporting disparities after multimodal treatment for rectal cancer: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Essential Updates 2024-2026: Advances in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Masakatsu NumataDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Kanagawa Japan.
Jun WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Kanagawa Japan.
Yuichiro TsukadaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Yusuke SuwaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Kanagawa Japan.
Yosuke FukunagaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research Tokyo Japan.
Yasumitsu HiranoDivision of Gastroenterological Surgery Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Kazuhiro SakamotoDepartment of Coloproctological Surgery Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7087-1667
Hiroki HamamotoDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2294-4673
Masanori YoshimitsuDepartment of Surgery Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital Hiroshima Japan.
Hisanaga HorieDepartment of Surgery Jichi Medical University Tochigi Japan.
Nobuhisa MatsuhashiDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery and Pediatric surgery Gifu University, Graduate School of Medicine Gifu Japan.
Yoshiaki KuriuDepartment of Surgery Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Shuntaro NagaiDepartment of Surgery and Oncology Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Madoka HamadaDigestive Disease Center Chikamori Hospital Kochi Japan.
Shinichi YoshiokaDepartment of Surgery Yao Municipal Hospital Osaka Japan.
Shinobu OhnumaDepartment of Surgery Tohoku University Hospital Miyagi Japan.
Tamuro HayamaDepartment of Surgery Teikyo University school of medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0216-1743
Koki OtsukaDepartment of Surgery Iwate Medical University School of Medicine Iwate Japan.
Yusuke InoueDepartment of Surgery Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Nagasaki Japan.
Kazuki UedaDivision of Endoscopic & Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7139-4404
Yuji ToiyamaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery Mie University Mie Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1301-3268
Satoshi MaruyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata Japan.
Shigeki YamaguchiDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Tokyo Women's Medical University Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3850-2818
Keitaro TanakaDepartment of General and Gastroenterological Surgery Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Osaka Japan.
Takeshi NaitohDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-6334
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Surgery Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Motoko SuzukiDepartment of Data Science National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Toshihiro MisumiDepartment of Data Science National Cancer Center Hospital East Chiba Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment of Colorectal Surgery Kansai Medical University Osaka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-2707
Ultimate Trial Group in Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Preserving anorectal function while achieving oncological success is crucial in the treatment of lower rectal cancer near the anal canal. Despite advancements in laparoscopic surgery that facilitate anal preservation, post-operative anorectal dysfunction considerably affects quality of life. Both hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses are suitable options for tumors located 4-5 cm from the anus. However, evidence comparing the functional outcomes and complications associated with both anastomosis methods is lacking. Methods: This multicenter, single-arm prospective study included patients with cT1-T2/N0/M0 adenocarcinoma located 4-5 cm from the anal verge, scheduled for upfront laparoscopic surgery. Anorectal function, post-operative complications, urinary and male sexual function, and oncological outcomes were assessed using the validated scores. Results: A total of 135 patients were analyzed and divided into hand-sewn ( Conclusion: Stapled anastomosis may provide better anorectal function with comparable safety and oncological outcomes to hand-sewn anastomosis. Therefore, stapled anastomosis may be preferred for tumors located 4-5 cm from the anal verge to ensure oncological safety. Trial Registration: This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System (UMIN 000011750).

Indexed as

anorectal functionhand‐sewn anastomosislower anterior resectionrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID41199980
PMCPMC12586937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.