ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
External Validation of an Automated Surgical Step Recognition Model for Robotic Distal Gastrectomy (RDG) Using a Multicenter Dataset.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Assisted Recognition of Actual Ureteral and Pancreatic Injuries in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Video Review Study.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Innovations in artificial intelligence (AI) are revolutionizing surgical practices, enhancing the analysis and outcomes of complex procedures. Recent advances in AI-based computer vision have enabled our team to develop a novel artificial intelligence model that can recognize defined steps of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG). Methods: This study assessed 130 robotic surgical videos from two institutions, 69 and 61 videos, respectively. The AI model used TeCNO, a multi-stage temporal convolutional network, and was trained using annotated videos with surgical steps defined by qualified surgeons. RDG step recognition predicted by the model was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and F-value metrics, and statistical analysis was assessed. Results: Three data sets were established to train and test the model. AI trained on single institution training sets performs moderately well at predicting RDG surgical steps with accuracies ranging from 56% to 63%, whereas AI trained on the multi-institutional data yielded a step recognition accuracy of 86%. These results were confirmed with Conclusions: We demonstrated that an AI step recognition model for RDG can predict surgical steps in an external video dataset with moderate accuracy. Furthermore, we conclude that training an AI model on a multi-institutional dataset significantly increases its step recognition capabilities. These results confirm that our model can be utilized by external institutions, and that a diverse training set of RDG procedures from multiple institutions is valuable to developing an AI model with precise step recognition capabilities in new institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.