Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199971›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025

Surgery for Older Cancer Patients: Cross-Organ Review and Good Practice Statement by the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee.

Chie Tanaka, Takashi Ofuchi, Kiichiro Ninomiya, Daisuke Inoue, Ken Sugimoto, Keiko Murofushi, Toru Okuyama, Shigeaki Watanuki, Chiyo Imamura, Daisuke Sakai and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chie TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Aichi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7931-8753
Takashi OfuchiDepartment of Surgery Kyushu University Beppu Hospital Beppu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6219-5278
Kiichiro NinomiyaCenter for Comprehensive Genomic Medicine Okayama University Hospital Okayama Japan.
Daisuke InoueDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Fukui Fukui Japan.
Ken SugimotoDepartment of General Geriatric Medicine Kawasaki Medical School Okayama Japan.
Keiko MurofushiDivision of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Toru OkuyamaDepartment of Psychiatry/Palliative Care Center Nagoya City University West Medical Center Aichi Japan.
Shigeaki WatanukiNational Center for Global Health and Medicine National College of Nursing Tokyo Japan.
Chiyo ImamuraAdvanced Cancer Translational Research Institute Showa University Tokyo Japan.
Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine Osaka Japan.
Naomi SakuraiCancer Solutions Co. Ltd Tokyo Japan.
Kiyotaka WatanabeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine Teikyo University Tokyo Japan.
Kazuo TamuraNPO Clinical Hematology/Oncology Treatment Study Group Fukuoka Japan.
Toshiaki SaekiBreast Oncology Service Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Hiroshi IshiguroBreast Oncology Service Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the number of older people is increasing, there is a lack of evidence and insufficient consensus regarding postoperative complications and survival in older cancer patients. In this study, we conducted a literature search and systematic review focusing on the outcomes after surgery for older cancer patients. Methods: Literature focusing on surgical treatment for older cancer patients was extracted from Japanese clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and gynecological cancers (uterine body, uterine cervix, ovary, and external genitalia and vagina). Outcomes were reviewed, and committee members determined the strength of evidence on a four-point scale (A to D), with A being the highest and D being the lowest. Results: Older cancer patients tend to have a higher incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative syndromes, and their expected survival is generally shorter compared to non-older patients. When extensive surgeries such as para-aortic lymph node dissection and/or resection with other organs are performed for older cancer patients, the postoperative mortality rates tend to increase compared to non-older patients. Conclusion: Surgical treatments for older cancer patients tend to result in higher morbidity even when the patients are in good health status. Nevertheless, there is still a possibility that a certain fraction of the patients achieve treatment outcomes comparable to those of non-older patients. Therefore, surgical indication and procedure for older cancer patients should be carefully determined based on surgical invasiveness and patient tolerability.

Indexed as

cancerolder patientssurgery

Identifiers

PMID41199971
PMCPMC12586954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.