ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Surgery for Older Cancer Patients: Cross-Organ Review and Good Practice Statement by the Japanese Geriatric Oncology Guideline Committee.
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Older Age Does Not Have an Impact on Postoperative Complication Risk Following Transurethral Resection of the Bladder Tumor.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Impairment of preoperative activities of daily living predicts poor prognosis after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Adjuvant chemotherapy and lymph node examination interact to shape survival in older adults (≥ 75 years) with resected gastric cancer: a SEER-based propensity score-matched and competing-risk analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Cancer as an Alternative Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study".Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the number of older people is increasing, there is a lack of evidence and insufficient consensus regarding postoperative complications and survival in older cancer patients. In this study, we conducted a literature search and systematic review focusing on the outcomes after surgery for older cancer patients. Methods: Literature focusing on surgical treatment for older cancer patients was extracted from Japanese clinical practice guidelines for gastric cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, and gynecological cancers (uterine body, uterine cervix, ovary, and external genitalia and vagina). Outcomes were reviewed, and committee members determined the strength of evidence on a four-point scale (A to D), with A being the highest and D being the lowest. Results: Older cancer patients tend to have a higher incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative syndromes, and their expected survival is generally shorter compared to non-older patients. When extensive surgeries such as para-aortic lymph node dissection and/or resection with other organs are performed for older cancer patients, the postoperative mortality rates tend to increase compared to non-older patients. Conclusion: Surgical treatments for older cancer patients tend to result in higher morbidity even when the patients are in good health status. Nevertheless, there is still a possibility that a certain fraction of the patients achieve treatment outcomes comparable to those of non-older patients. Therefore, surgical indication and procedure for older cancer patients should be carefully determined based on surgical invasiveness and patient tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.