ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2025
Significance of Neoadjuvant S-1-Based Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Impact of Low-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been extensively developed for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). In Asia, S-1-based regimens, such as docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) and S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX), are expected to become the standard of care. However, the data on the significance of NAC for older patients with advanced GC remains scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of NAC in older patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients with cStage II-III locally advanced GC who underwent radical surgery at our institution between 2015 and 2021. This study included three groups: 56 patients with NAC and age < 75 years (NAC-Young group), 20 with NAC and age ≥ 75 years (NAC-Older group), and 46 without NAC and age ≥ 75 years (OP-Older group). Patient backgrounds, adverse events of NAC, and prognoses were compared among the groups. Results: Compared with the NAC-Young group, the NAC-Older group was more likely to receive the SOX regimen and reduced initial doses, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events of NAC and prognosis. Compared to the OP-Older group, overall survival and cancer-specific survival tended to be better in the NAC-Older group at cStage III. Moreover, for patients with cStage III and ECOG-PS 0, cancer-specific survival was significantly better in the NAC-Older group compared to the OP-Older group ( Conclusions: NAC with S-1-based regimens is a feasible and effective treatment option for older patients with GC with advanced-stage disease and good overall condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.