Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199926›Full record

ArticleCase reports in urology2025

Epididymal Dissociation to Facilitate Vasectomy Reversal in a Patient With Sizeable Vasal Defect: A Case Report.

Jack C Millot, Aaron J Smith, Scott D Lundy

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jack C MillotCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0436-2746
Aaron J SmithNorthwell Health Urology, Northwell Health, Great Neck, New York, USA.
Scott D LundyGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-4295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Close to a quarter of men seek paternity after vasectomy. Microsurgical vasectomy reversal is a common choice for men seeking children after vasectomy, with outcomes dependent on surgical expertise and intraoperative decision-making. Here, we describe the case of a patient with an unexpectedly long vasal gap that necessitated the dissection of the tail and midbody of the epididymis from the testis during a vasoepididymostomy. Case Discussion: We report a case of a 31-year-old male who underwent vasectomy reversal that required a rare surgical approach. During the operation, we discovered a secondary distal obstruction and an additional proximal obstruction on the patient's left side, which resulted in a long vasal gap that did not permit a tension-free vasoepididymostomy. To bridge the long gap, the tail and midbody of the epididymis were carefully dissected and mobilized from the testis. Dissociation of the epididymis from the testis allowed a tension-free vasoepididymostomy. Postoperative semen analysis confirmed patency, and the patient had no concerns. Conclusion: Dissection of the tail and midbody of the epididymis is discussed in textbooks, but is not readily documented in real-world patients. Here, we provide a case discussion where the dissection of the epididymis from the testis was successfully performed to gain additional length to bridge a long vasal gap.

Identifiers

PMID41199926
PMCPMC12588767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.