ArticleCase reports in urology2025
Epididymal Dissociation to Facilitate Vasectomy Reversal in a Patient With Sizeable Vasal Defect: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Close to a quarter of men seek paternity after vasectomy. Microsurgical vasectomy reversal is a common choice for men seeking children after vasectomy, with outcomes dependent on surgical expertise and intraoperative decision-making. Here, we describe the case of a patient with an unexpectedly long vasal gap that necessitated the dissection of the tail and midbody of the epididymis from the testis during a vasoepididymostomy. Case Discussion: We report a case of a 31-year-old male who underwent vasectomy reversal that required a rare surgical approach. During the operation, we discovered a secondary distal obstruction and an additional proximal obstruction on the patient's left side, which resulted in a long vasal gap that did not permit a tension-free vasoepididymostomy. To bridge the long gap, the tail and midbody of the epididymis were carefully dissected and mobilized from the testis. Dissociation of the epididymis from the testis allowed a tension-free vasoepididymostomy. Postoperative semen analysis confirmed patency, and the patient had no concerns. Conclusion: Dissection of the tail and midbody of the epididymis is discussed in textbooks, but is not readily documented in real-world patients. Here, we provide a case discussion where the dissection of the epididymis from the testis was successfully performed to gain additional length to bridge a long vasal gap.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.