Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199891›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

ElevéL: Superior Pedicle Reduction Mammoplasty With L-shaped Scar.

Sergio A Arbeláez, Sergio Arbeláez, Rosa C Eslait, Carlos J Lacouture, Jorge Tarud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sergio A ArbeláezFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery Bonadona Hospital, Clinica Reina Catalina, Clinica la Merced, Sura EPS, Salud Total EPS, Professor Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Sergio ArbeláezFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery Bonadona Hospital, Clinica Reina Catalina, Clinica la Merced, Sura EPS, Salud Total EPS, Professor Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Rosa C EslaitFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery Bonadona Hospital, Clinica Reina Catalina, Clinica la Merced, Sura EPS, Salud Total EPS, Professor Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Carlos J LacoutureDivision of Plastic Surgery, Bogotá, Colombia.
Jorge TarudDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Universidad Simon Bolivar, Barranquilla, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An L-shaped scar in reduction mammoplasty is a scar pattern that has been gaining popularity among plastic surgeons because of the lower number of complications and improved aesthetic results. The main objective of this article was to describe a new technique of upper pedicle reduction mammoplasty with large tissue resections, always using an L-scar pattern. Methods: The ElevéL technique was performed in 270 patients who underwent surgery between 2023 and 2025; follow-up examination was carried out for an average of 1 year. A patient satisfaction survey was conducted (BREAST-Q). Results: Two (0.8%) patients presented partial necrosis of the nipple-areola complex, 0 patients had surgical infections, 3 patients had wound dehiscence, no patients presented hematoma, and 13 (4.8%) had widening of the areola. Alterations in the sensibility of the nipple-areola complex occurred in 23 patients who had partially recovered sensibility (subjectively reported by the patients). Conclusions: Compared with other reduction mammoplasty techniques, the ElevéL technique has shown lower complication rates, coupled with less scarring, making it a good technique for all plastic surgeons to routinely perform.

Identifiers

PMID41199891
PMCPMC12588721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.