Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199773›Full record

ArticleDiscover public health2025

Predictors of psychological well-being during imposed prolonged absence from work.

Holly Blake, Juliet Hassard, Maria Karanika-Murray, Wei Hoong Choo, Louise Thomson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3080-2306
Juliet HassardQueen's Business School, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Maria Karanika-MurraySchool of Management, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Wei Hoong ChooSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Louise ThomsonSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Between March 2020 and September 2021, 11.7 million employee jobs were furloughed through the UK Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (JRS). Imposed work absence shielded workers from job loss, but furloughed workers had increased risk of poor mental health compared to those who stayed working. Understanding the factors that mitigate psychological distress during imposed work absence can inform actions to be taken in future crises. Aims: To explore the relationships between (a) work and home demands with well-being outcomes, and (b) personal and organisational resources with well-being outcomes, during periods of imposed prolonged absence and uncertainty. Methods: We analysed online survey data collected with furloughed workers in the UK 'Wellbeing of the Workforce Study'. Measures included psychological well-being, anxiety, life satisfaction, job insecurity, home demands (quantitative and emotional), organisational support for work-family balance, and personal resources (resilience, purpose, and coping ability). Results: Psychological well-being was associated positively with quantitative home demands (β = 0.24, Conclusions: Job-related factors are less influential during periods of employment uncertainty compared to personal and home resources. Decision-makers should provide psychological support during periods of job uncertainty and bolster the essential benefits of personal and home resources. Moving forwards, these findings may have broader applicability to other challenges and crises, such as suspension from work, or role changes resulting from organisational restructuring.

Indexed as

FurloughJob uncertaintySurveyWellbeingWorkforceWork-related absence

Identifiers

PMID41199773
PMCPMC12588374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.