From Pores to Pavement: Advanced Modeling of Aluminosilicates for Scalable Carbon Capture in Concrete.

Pooja Anil Kumar Nair, Jéssica de O N Ribeiro, Murilo Daniel de Mello Innocentini, Kevin Paine, Juliana Calabria-Holley

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pooja Anil Kumar NairRENEW Centre for Regenerative Engineering and Design for a Net Positive World, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, UK.

Jéssica de O N RibeiroDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, Federal University of Lavras, Ekaterinburg, 37203202, Brazil.

Murilo Daniel de Mello InnocentiniRENEW Centre for Regenerative Engineering and Design for a Net Positive World, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, UK.

Kevin PaineCentre for Climate Adaptation and Environment Research, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, UK.

Juliana Calabria-HolleyRENEW Centre for Regenerative Engineering and Design for a Net Positive World, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0764-9473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work marks a significant advance in developing scalable, material-based solutions for carbon capture. Universal Isotherm Modeling (UIM) provides a transferable modeling approach applicable to a wide range of porous materials, laying a foundation for future innovations in carbon capture. Although focused on innovative construction materials, the impact of this study extends across environmental engineering, materials science, and industrial decarbonisation, with implications for membrane technologies and adsorbent optimisation. Combining UIM with experimental data, the effects of alumina content, solvent choice, and amine functionalization were investigated on CO

Indexed as

carbon capture materialscementitious compositesengineered aluminosilicatesscalable building materialsuniversal isotherm modeling

Identifiers

PMID41199660

DOI10.1002/advs.202517317

PMCPMC13325500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.