ArticleInternational journal of circumpolar health2025
A remote first nation community-informed virtual care approach to chronic back pain management: a mixed methods study.
Article in International journal of circumpolar health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2025
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic back pain (CBP) is a widespread public health issue. There is a lack of community-based care options for Indigenous Peoples with CBP. A virtual care clinic co-designed with community was implemented in the Cree Community of Pelican Narrows using remote presence (RPR) technology. Methods We used a community-based participatory action framework and pre-post design to evaluate this intervention. Pain, quality of life and experience outcomes were measured. An assessment was provided by a local nurse practitioner and a physical therapist joining over RPR. The physical therapist provided jp to four follow-up treatments per participant using RPR. Results Thirty-eight participants were assessed, and 78 follow-up treatments delivered. No significant differences between pre- and post- pain or quality of life were found. Thirteen patient participants and five health providers completed interviews. Patient themes included: (1) community and healthcare context, (2) community preferences for back pain care, and (3) experience with virtual back pain clinic. Health care provider themes included: (1) getting people to clinic, (2) experience with virtual back pain clinic, and (3) ways to enhance care. Conclusion Virtual CBP clinic enhanced access to therapy and was experienced positively. Participants suggested ways to address challenges, including a hybrid model of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.