Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199460›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurochemistry2025

Crosstalk Between Astrocytes and Inhibitory Neurons During Maturation: Emerging Mechanisms and Functional Implications.

Niina Lehti Tauriala, Vered Kellner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Niina Lehti TaurialaDepartment of Neurophysiology and Neuropharmacology, Centre for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Vered KellnerDepartment of Neurophysiology and Neuropharmacology, Centre for Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0611-2308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astrocytes, once regarded merely as passive support cells in the brain, have recently emerged as active partners to neurons in sensory processing, learning and memory. By promoting the development, maturation and refinement of neuronal synapses, astrocytes play a central role in shaping brain circuitry. Within these circuits, inhibitory neurons comprise approximately 20% of brain cells, with variation across regions and developmental stages. The fundamental importance of inhibition is underscored by its evolutionary conservation, being present even in primitive nervous systems. Notably, astrocyte development coincides temporally with a peak in synaptogenesis and with the maturation of inhibitory neurons, suggesting potential interplay between these processes. Historically, research has primarily focused on astrocyte interactions with excitatory neurons; however, there is growing recognition of the likely significance of astrocyte-inhibitory neuron crosstalk, particularly during critical developmental periods. Here we review current knowledge on the development of astrocytes and inhibitory neurons, highlight emerging evidence for their interactions and propose hypotheses to guide future research.

Indexed as

AstrocytesBrainCell CommunicationNeural InhibitionNeuronsAnimalsHumansNeurogenesisactivity‐dependentastrocytesdevelopmentinhibitory neurons

Identifiers

PMID41199460
PMCPMC12592777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.