Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199418›Full record

ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2026

Towards better Diabetes Data Rights: Data protection, data 'ownership', and developing a patient charter.

Ruby Reed-Berendt, Jessica Bell, Louise Hatherall, Holly Hayes, Shane O'Donnell, Muireann Quigley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Towards better Diabetes Data Rights: Data protection, data 'ownership', and developing a patient charter.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruby Reed-BerendtBirmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6587-255X
Jessica BellSchool of law, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3433-0265
Louise HatherallBirmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1237-5536
Holly HayesBirmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5398-8167
Shane O'DonnellBirmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3778-705X
Muireann QuigleyBirmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3780-4371

Funding

Arts and Humanities Research CouncilEuropean CommissionResearch EnglandUniversity of BirminghamWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important implication of the increasing availability and use of technologies to support care for people with diabetes is that huge quantities of data are now being generated about them on a routine basis. This has led to calls for people with diabetes to have greater access to and control over how 'their' health data are used. In this article, we analyse some of the legal challenges arising in this context. Focusing on the United Kingdom and European Union, we point to the lack of a clear legal framework to balance the different interests in the context of diabetes data, noting that calls for 'data ownership', while understandable, do not fit easily within existing legal frameworks and would not offer the kind of protections that some within the diabetes community are advocating for. We offer suggestions for supporting such calls. We first note the existing, but perhaps under-utilised, legal mechanisms available to people with diabetes over their data, such as data subject rights under the General Data Protection Regulation. Then, drawing inspiration from existing and emergent frameworks, we argue that the interests of people with diabetes could be bolstered by something like the Diabetes Data Rights Charter currently being co-developed by researchers and members of the diabetes community.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityDiabetes MellitusOwnershipPatient RightsEuropean UnionHumansUnited Kingdomclinical diabetesdata ownershipdata protectiondiabetes data

Identifiers

PMID41199418
PMCPMC12857859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.