ArticleDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2026
Towards better Diabetes Data Rights: Data protection, data 'ownership', and developing a patient charter.
Article in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformations in Diabetes Care: Lessons From Commons-Based, Peer-Produced Citizen Science.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- Towards better Diabetes Data Rights: Data protection, data 'ownership', and developing a patient charter.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An important implication of the increasing availability and use of technologies to support care for people with diabetes is that huge quantities of data are now being generated about them on a routine basis. This has led to calls for people with diabetes to have greater access to and control over how 'their' health data are used. In this article, we analyse some of the legal challenges arising in this context. Focusing on the United Kingdom and European Union, we point to the lack of a clear legal framework to balance the different interests in the context of diabetes data, noting that calls for 'data ownership', while understandable, do not fit easily within existing legal frameworks and would not offer the kind of protections that some within the diabetes community are advocating for. We offer suggestions for supporting such calls. We first note the existing, but perhaps under-utilised, legal mechanisms available to people with diabetes over their data, such as data subject rights under the General Data Protection Regulation. Then, drawing inspiration from existing and emergent frameworks, we argue that the interests of people with diabetes could be bolstered by something like the Diabetes Data Rights Charter currently being co-developed by researchers and members of the diabetes community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.