ArticleStem cell research & therapy2025
'I had no choice!' Challenges in the informed consent and decision-making process for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a qualitative method triangulation.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The perceptions of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation decision-making in patients with hematologic malignancies: a qualitative systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFor some patients allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) offers the only chance for cure. There is limited empirical data on the informed consent (IC) process and respective perceptions and evaluations of alloSCT patients so far.
objectiveThe objective of this single centre empirical-ethical study is to explore the IC and decision-making process in the context of alloSCT at a German university hospital, with a particular focus on ethical challenges. STUDY
designFrom 10/2021 to 12/2023, 8 patients were followed during 16 separate IC consultations on alloSCT, by non-participant observation respectively. In addition, a separate interview in the absence of other medical personnel was conducted with the patients after alloSCT about the consultations and the reasons for their decision. Transcripts were analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven and included triangulation of interview and observational data.
resultsWe observed eight patients at the two IC consultations each and interviewed seven after completed alloSCT. Consultations were carried out by three different physicians and together lasted a median of 89 min. The patient surveys were conducted at the time of the patients' discharge from hospital, after the transplant had been performed. Patients had a positive overall impression of the information process and appreciated it. A central theme in the analysis was patients' impression of having had "no choice" in the treatment decision. Various possible reasons for this narrative could be identified in the interviews and triangulated with the results of our observations. The patients' motives for their choice were: the therapeutic goal of healing; fear of death; the desire to live longer and trust in medical expertise. There was often a lack of awareness about other treatment options on the side of the patients. Observations suggest that the consultations focused on the physician's recommendations while palliative treatment was presented in a limited way. Extensive planning which is necessary for successful alloSCT may be perceived as organisational pressure on decision-making by patients.
conclusionThe narrative of not having had a choice is complex and should be explored further by a specific catalog of specific questions. In particular, the organisational processes and the pressure they may place on patients should be examined more closely and reflected upon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.