ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025
Beyond traditional models: a content analysis exploring the applicability of harm reduction in eating disorder care.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Care approaches for people with longstanding eating disorders: a lived experience perspective on the need for recovery-fostering care.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Effectiveness without safety: a response to Duggan, Hardy, and Waller (2026).Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders can place an individual at significant risk of physical harm. Despite this, there is minimal guidance on how to empower individuals to recognise and minimise potential harms to their physical safety. This paper explores the recommendation to incorporate harm reduction strategies within eating disorders care by an eating disorder consultation service to clinicians working with individuals who have eating disorders. The aim of this paper was to examine how often, and in what contexts, HR approaches were deemed applicable during eating disorder specific public mental health case consultations.
methodsAdult case consultation records from an eating disorder consultation service in Australia were retrospectively analysed to examine the frequency at which harm reduction approaches were considered applicable to the consultation question. Content analysis was performed to examine the context in which the potential utility of harm reduction was discussed.
resultsOut of 45 adult secondary case consultation records accessed, almost three-quarters reported that a harm reduction framework was discussed as part of the secondary consultation. Content analyses revealed that 33.33% of consultations recommended harm reduction in the context of treatment engagement, 21.21% in the context of treatment ambivalence, and 45.45% in the context of concerns for physical safety whilst an individual was engaged in eating disorders care.
conclusionsOur results give preliminary indication that harm reduction approaches may have utility in supporting individuals with eating disorders to reduce their risk of physical harm across the spectrum of motivation and treatment engagement. Given the high incidence of physical harms associated with eating disorders, further studies examining the application and effectiveness of harm reduction approaches for eating disorders would likely be of benefit to the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.