Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41199366›Full record

SynthesisParticle and fibre toxicology2025

A systematic review of the potential neurotoxicity of micro-and nanoplastics: the known and unknown.

Kinga Vojnits, Andrés de León, Julien Gibon, Philip Barker, Morteza Mahmoudi, Sepideh Pakpour

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Caenorhabditis elegans as an Alternative Model in Pharmacological and Toxicological Studies Involving Microplastics.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Nanoplastics and Neurodegeneration: A Roadmap From Mechanism to Causation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Advances in ecotoxicological research using planarians: a comprehensive review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kinga VojnitsSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Andrés de LeónSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Julien GibonOffice of the Vice-Principal Research and Innovation, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Philip BarkerDepartment of Biology, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Morteza MahmoudiDepartment of Radiology & Precision Health Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Sepideh PakpourSchool of Engineering, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada. sepideh.pakpour@ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe escalating accumulation of micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) in the environment has raised significant concerns regarding their neurotoxic potential in vertebrates. This critical review synthesizes evidence from 234 original research articles across aquatic and terrestrial models, as well as in vitro systems, to evaluate the impacts of MNPs on the brain. MAIN BODY: Emerging data suggest that MNPs may reach the brain via olfactory translocation or by penetrating the blood-brain barrier, potentially facilitated by biomolecular corona formation. However, distribution kinetics, long-term retention, and true internal exposure levels remain unresolved. We highlight that neurotoxic outcomes, such as oxidative stress, cholinergic dysfunction, neurotransmitter imbalances, and neuronal apoptosis, vary widely depending on particle size, shape, polymer type, exposure concentration, and host species. Nevertheless, inconsistencies across models and experimental conditions, such as mismatches between oxidative stress markers and behavioral effects or lack of dose-response relationships, hinder mechanistic clarity and translational relevance to human health. Notably, most current studies employ spherical polystyrene particles at supraphysiological concentrations, limiting ecological and clinical extrapolation. Interactions with microbial biofilms and host microbiota are largely unexplored, despite their probable role in modulating neurotoxicity via the gut-brain axis. Moreover, most studies rely on analytical methods validated only for microplastic detection, while robust, standardized approaches for identifying nanoplastics in environmental and biological matrices remain lacking. These gaps hinder accurate exposure quantification, obscure tissue-specific accumulation patterns, and complicate human health risk estimation.

conclusionTo advance the field, we recommend comprehensive physicochemical characterization of MNPs, adoption of environmentally relevant exposure scenarios, inclusion of diverse polymer types and shapes, and mechanistic integration through multi-omics and adverse outcome pathway frameworks. Addressing these challenges through harmonized methodologies and interdisciplinary collaboration is essential for developing predictive models of MNP-induced neurotoxicity and informing human health risk assessments.

Indexed as

BrainMicroplasticsNanoparticlesNeurotoxicity SyndromesAnimalsHumansOxidative StressParticle SizeRisk AssessmentMicroplasticsEnvironmental pollutantsIn vitro modelsIn vivo modelsMicroplasticsNanoplasticsNeurotoxicitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41199366
PMCPMC12590691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.