ArticleJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Differences in stress coping between individuals from Germany and American Samoa and their relation to obesity, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms.
Article in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress and how individuals cope with it can have substantial implications for health. As the socio-cultural environment influences individual perceptions of stress and coping behavior, differences between cultural groups may have different effects on physical and mental health. Using qualitative interviews and questionnaires, this study examined cultural differences in stress coping and their interplay with perceived stress (Perceived Stress Questionnaire, Trier Inventory for Chronic Stress), BMI (normal-weight, obesity), and depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory Short Form) in young adults from Germany (individualistic society, n = 120) and American Samoa (collectivistic society, n = 56). Stress coping strategies were assessed through interviews, after which the data were quantified as problem-focused, emotion-focused, or avoidance coping. Group differences in coping strategies were analyzed using Gamma generalized linear models, group differences in perceived stress and depressive symptoms were analyzed using univariate ANCOVAs. The results showed that the German group used more problem-focused coping, while the Samoan group used more avoidance coping. The use of avoidance coping was associated with higher perceived stress in the German group but with lower perceived stress in the Samoan group. In general, depressive symptoms were higher among participants from the Samoan than the German group. However, Samoan individuals with obesity who used avoidance coping had lower depressive symptoms than Samoan individuals with obesity who did not. This difference was not observed in the German group. Irrespective of cultural background, individuals with obesity tended to use more avoidance and less emotion-focused coping, and to report eating more during stress compared to individuals with normal-weight. On the one hand, our findings may contribute to a better understanding of how the cultural environment influences stress coping and its potential adaptive effects on perceived stress and depressive symptoms, highlighting the need for culturally appropriate stress management interventions. On the other hand, the association between weight status and avoidance coping might be relatively stable across cultures, offering opportunities for intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.